Monday, May 23, 2011

Philosophy of coexistence

The company is the ultimate in human evolution. We live in a cohesive society that provides for all human needs, whether natural or cultured. Cohesion is the most important factor in coexistence. Philosophy of coexistence is not a matter of debate, but a truth. Few of us really wonder about the mechanics of our world and society we live in the cohesion and co-existence of the path of human evolution and the final domain of the planet has paved. In the early stages of developmentHumanity paved the acceptance of individual uniqueness of the way for our development and progress. People tend to look like nature for inspiration and models that are worth emulating. The use of equipment or personal hygiene may have been selected by crows and cats. The use of shelters by nature and its quirks have been forced, but the selection of an address would have been influenced cave dwelling animals. Plumage and cosmetics, the result of observation of the mating rituals of birds even if the opposite sex in humans, it has a habit. Regardless of the stage was set and put into practice, people have adapted and comfortable for other people. Animal kingdom has its own strict and rigid values ??that has limited the development of individuals. People differ from animals in this fundamental sense. The animals had to tow the line or an outcast. The human being is unique and distinctive trends accepted and understood all the positive (and some negative) characteristics in our culture. The basePhilosophy was established in co-existence of nature.

It is easy to make assumptions and deliberate on the issue. However, "but" a constant in human evolution. We went from the Stone Age, rocket science, but progress has its consequences. We have found the secret of DNA, and broke through the barrier room. We are still fighting diseases such as cancer and AIDS. The world has shrunk by supersonic travel and broadband. However, we still have to get usedus to different cultures and beliefs. Pizza and sushi are ubiquitous, but we are not taking on family values ??and filial duties by the cultures themselves. Yoga and acupuncture are common, but we still have to assimilate into our society. Equality and equality of conditions is accepted as a fundamental right in the world. However, we do not have to leave the class and caste and gender discrimination.

The next line with the philosophy of living together is the wayExchange. The saying "money is the root of all evil" not out of greed makes stem. Money or money's worth created isolated pockets of humanity. If the transmission is through the exchange interaction was inevitable. Cohesion made sense, and only a cohesive society could exist under ideal conditions. If the medium of exchange was invented and put into practice, the man has changed his behavior. Created classes and creeds. Humanity has lost its cohesion and coexistence of the philosophyU-Turn. E 'was co-existence between rich and poor. The change was inevitable, given the human propensity to change. However, the change will be the "root of all evil." The discrimination became widespread, and humanity has been lost or acquired a different meaning. Philosophy of living together has become one of the serfs and masters courses. It was not just living together, but they correspond. The world population is in harmony with itself distinctive lifestyle.

The central philosophy of theCoexistence is the ability to accept different beliefs. Humanity has developed a sense of always being super. The original convictions were inexplicable about it. Once this has been refined to dogmas and doctrines. The articulate common beliefs, the logical and credible circumstances were involved. Arguments and assumptions for the ordinary people through repetition and repetition filtered. to bring charisma and personality played a role is the cohesion of society.This proved to be the coexistence of a disadvantage to the philosophy. Different beliefs found it difficult to accept other ways of life. Conflicts have occurred between the different faiths. They tried to dominate and lead to another puzzle. Two cultures differ in this. Sanatana Dharma and Shinto, for association with nature-oriented and peaceful coexistence. They ignored the principles of human diversity and accept the universal truth of unity. The philosophy ofCo-existence does not depend on give and take, but acceptance.

Source: http://entertainment-philosophy.chailit.com/philosophy-of-coexistence.html

capa cosi labrador retriever 2012 honda civic wfc intc brian wilson

No comments:

Post a Comment

Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.